Why Employees Resist Organizational Change Essay

Why Employees Resist Organizational form - Essay fontThey fear that they might non be able to achieve as much in the unseasoned setup as they did in the onetime(a) one.2. In order to accept the change and arrive at correspond to it, people need to come out of their comfort zone that they have developed in the old setting. Most people would not do that happily, and would thus resist change.3. The change may not of all time bring benefits to every individual that forms part of the musical arrangement. In such cases, people whose positions are being negatively affected by the instruction execution of the change tend to consider it disruptive and totally unnecessary. To them, if the change is not beneficial for them, it is not beneficial for anybody else. In fact, such employees do not see things in the larger picture.5. In the old setup, employees develop support systems, which they can rely on in tough times. If the civilise environment is changes, they may lose their suppor t systems and be exposed to more challenges. They are reluctant to work under new supervisors on new projects with new colleagues because they would have no one to support them if they fail.6. many an(prenominal) employees tend to have closed minds after they have made their mind. The facts and figures of the supporting documentation pertaining to the change fob these employees. They keep a No way response to any strategy that is proposed by the management for the implementation of change.7. Employees are tentative to give a try to the new work routines and are unwilling to reckon new things. They are over-confident and think that they know too much to know anything new. Such employees decline the organizations ability to grow with the new knowledge. Their personal growth is also restricted by their stubbornness.9. Change is unfamiliar, so it is resisted. No more than 66.5 per cent of the employees were found to be aware of the changes being implemented in a survey (Peter Barron Stark Companies, n.d.). Their lack of sufficient