.

Friday, March 22, 2019

Would You Buy a Car That Looked Like This Essay -- Article Review, And

Andrew Simms, a policy director and head of the Climate qualifying Program for the New Economics Foundation in England, presents his argument more or less the impact SUVs have on our roadways, and the air we breathe. Would You Buy a Car That Looked like This? . The title alone gives great insight on what the article is going to be about, (vehicles). They clog the streets and litter the pages of weekend deform *supplements. Sport utility vehicles or SUVs have become badges of nerve center class aspiration (Simms 542). Simms opening statement not only gives his assurance on how SUVs are the new trend, but he excessively paints a picture of what we see e very day driving pop up our roadways. Simms too compares the tobacco industrys gap between range of mountains and reality to that of SUVs stating that the cause and consequences of climate change resemble skunk and cancer. Simms comparison between SUVs and cigarettes shows how dangerous he believes SUVs are.Simms believes that the SUVs weve grown to love are dangerous and polluting. Simms describes just how damaging he believes SUVs to be with a quote, set to become, one of the worlds most common causes of death and disability-ahead of TB, HIV, and war (qtd. in Simms 542). This is a very strong statement so strong that it causes the reader to question the source. It in like manner promotes an emotional appeal to the reader. Death, war, and HIV are very serious issues comparing them to SUVs causes a indispensability for attention. Next Simms addresses how the Global heat convocation in two weeks causes urgency for some new thinking on SUVs. This statement shows Simms concerns about Global warming and the effects from SUVs. It also shows his need to inform. Then Simms introduces his solution, So shouldnt SUVs now ... ...countries Simms assumes readers will notion that its time for America to acknowledge the SUV Problem too and also take action. Finally Simms concludes his argument with his labeling solution. Simms proposes setting a threshold signpost which could be set to trigger the labeling when the efficiency drops below a sealed threshold. Like those for cigarettes, the warnings could cover 30-50 percent of the vehicles surface area (Simms 544). Simms also states that this order wont stop SUVs from being driven, but would sop up them to except the consequences of their actions, and help the education drive on global warming and traffic safety .In other words it would help the industry function out of denial. Simms statement shows that he has a realistic view on his solution. Also his conclusion reinforced his idea, promoted thought and gave readers a visual.

No comments:

Post a Comment