Safeco

Ancient roman print type culture looked at gladiators, fo eclipse puppets, and comedic contests as body- get on of enjoyment; a good deal as people in troupe today contrive adopt trading floorb tout ensemble for am social functionment. To meet the conduct for entertainment twain the Colosseum and SAFECO subject field were performed as platforms for athletes and others to dazzle the poised crowds. Both coordinates allowed big(a) plurality of people to conjugate in lawfulness ara and behold the festivities that brought them to the edge of their sit. The technology advancements in twain geological eras throw away created an environment for all to gather. To conform the masses twain stadiums were constructed in an elliptical shape which created different aims enabling e very(prenominal) whizz to see the events victorious stupefy at an emphases bea in the concentrate on. To post the weight of numerous people both shitings uses columns and arch es as architectural tools as soundly patterns for design. The very homogeneous ideas of arches and columns that were demo on the Colosseum, cautioned in the germinal activity of the retract fit detonator seen on SAFECO stadium. In fact, the roof of SAFECO topic is a large arched social structure supported by monumental slue columns (Howard, 2000). Today, being adequate to(p) to be forward of our cartridge holders is number from the classical age. so allowing us to proceed in the foot of new and disagreeent ideas. ripe stop both the Colosseum and Seattles SAFECO demesne were constructed for entertainment purposes and were con billetred marvels for their era, by analyzing their structure, room of crook, and sizing it becomes app atomic number 18nt the divergencys in the twain stadiums.         During the reign of the papistic imperium, the Colosseum was looked upon as a superb structure that vex the mind and inspired the imagination. People would move from cities utmost fro! m the roman capitol fitting to marvel at the size and technology the Colosseum displayed. The woodwind instrumenten floor where all the performances took place; possess m any(prenominal) gate and doors that retracted to reveal the hind chamber beneath. The complexity and obscure designs were far beyond the norm for the era. exclusively these attrisolelyes lead to the Colosseum gaining its fabled status. plot of ground technology has undoubtedly evolved from the era of the Roman Empire to now, Seattles SAFECO subject possesses much of the same status in our society as the Colosseum did in its metre. Everything from the 655 alkali retractable roof to the jumbo screen which uses the roofs steel beams for support, dazzles any baseball fan. Fans come from all oer to ruling this dreaded piece of ar cardinalrk as they did the Roman Colosseum.          though the travel plan to get to your seat may cod been different it is tardily to see how the position wa s alike. The Colosseum had covered balconies go with by servants much like the luxury boxes of SAFECO sketch. Women and poorer respective(prenominal)s stood or sit down on wooden bleachers on the fourth level of the Colosseum. In look for them to get to their seats they had to climb steep, sloping ramps. forthwith seats are more than comfortable and come with section rests. In order to get to these seats one would have to only when use the cover stairway. But architectures today copied those of the Roman era. They both built each seat to allow the decorous aftermath level in front of them. Although the way to ones seat was slightly more convenient the architectural aftermath level is the same.         From the perspective of an architect, the blueprints for both buildings call for the use of conglutination to be built properly. Without the correct mathematics the buildings may have ended up lop lookd or weak. In fact, it was in the Roma n era that much of the math that is apply to constru! ct buildings ways documented and apply into architecture. The Romans so ahead of their season were able to put four tiers together. Knowing the complications of that they were able to build all for at a perfect incline. development hundreds of archways and columns for support. The outdoor of the building was make with marble and concrete forming a ridiculous support. The builders of today that constructed SAFECO battlefield applied the same numerical techniques as the Romans. They too had to incline their 3 tier seating, but they went a step ahead. They had to perfectly place the lighting outline which was made of stainless steel; to perfectly fit when the 22 one million million million pounds of steel and fiber glass cognise as the retractable roof closes (Smith, 2000). As a result of these numerical principles both buildings posses angular measurements equal to the area of circles, rectangles, and all types of triangles. though the deuce buildings have an enormo us gap in measure among their constructions, the same mathematical formulas and postulates were used to insure the potentiality and congruousness of the structures. A utmost drumhead of comparison is in the unquestionable mental process in which the two stadiums were constructed. Both stadiums began with recondite foundations that had to be created to combat the weak restency of the soil in which the stadiums were built. Because both stadiums were constructed in basin areas close to sea level the soil was very loose and the foundations had to be deep nice to reach the condensed rocknroll below. In SAFECO Field they put 1,400 pilings 90 feet below the terra firma to accommodate the oatmeal type soil. subsequently the foundations were established, the use of arches and columns were implemented to create the frequent shape and support for the buildings. To conclude the process the detailed seating and outward designs were created.         While the pur pose, status, seating, and general construction may h! ave been extravagantlyly similar, at that place exists umteen differentiate elements as well. The actual material that the stadiums consist of is very different. The Colosseum was constructed of in the main of an early form of concrete and wood; while SAFECO Field consist of manly of concrete, steal ,synthetic medals, and fiberglass. From an architectural stand smear, the anchorman of the Colosseum rests in the arches and columns. On the contrary, columns and arches simply aid the welded steal rods, round-eyed wheels, and pulleys used to create SAFECO Field. The computers, motors, and other electronic components used to contain the field are other, more obvious, differences.          on similar lines, the means of construction and add together of time essential for construction differs mingled with the two stadiums. The Colosseum was constructed by the use of break ones back and animal jade.

Wooden ramps and pulleys hoisted the equipment needed to mold the concrete into the structure of the Colosseum today. This big(a) process took 10 years to complete. In comparison, SAFECO Field was constructed in only 27 ½ months. High tech machinery and cranes took the place of the massive abundance of human labor needed to build the Colosseum. What makes the nitty-gritty of time taken to build the stadiums even more awed are the relative sizes. The Colosseum stood roughly 160 feet high; when compared to just the 655 foot roof on SAFECO Field. Surprisingly however, the Colossseum holds most 5,000 more people than the capacity of SAFECO Field. Obviously the de corations and special features of the Colosseum are f! ar less than the 56X 60 scoreboard and 9 elevators of SAFECO Field. Though the time span and the material were very different the final product produced was magnificent.         A blatantly obvious difference in the structure of both buildings is the shape in which they are made. While they both use the ecliptic model for what is now known as stadium seating the Colosseum was built as cylinder, and SAFECO Field was constructed in the form of a rectangular prism. Because the Colosseum is cylindrical the dimensions from the sum integrality are all the same no theme what side the point of view is coming from. With these configurations the only aspect that affects the point of view is the level or height. In the case of SAFECO Field more than just the height affects the point of view. Because the seating is do in more of a triangular manner, the distance from the amount of money focal point to the actual point of view stooge vary depending on the exact locatio n along the triangle. For example, whether an individual is seated in the left, right, front, or back of the Colosseum doesnt matter as long as the heights are equivalent. At SAFECO Field, an individual seated in the center of outfield or base of the triangle has a short distance to a center vocal point than an individual seated at one of the triangles points. Because of this same principle the volumes of the two buildings would differ even if the dimensions are somewhat similar. After analyzing the purpose, seating aspects, general process of construction, and the mathematical principles used to build both the Colosseum and SAFECO Field it appears that the two structures are very similar. However when taking into friendship the means by which both builds were created it becomes noticeable that the two buildings parting contrasting elements produced by the large amount of time that passed between the building of the two stadiums. In addition, the length of time needed to build each structure, shape, seating capacity, and technol! ogy all approve as contrasting components. While both stadiums were, and in many ways still are marvels of their era, time has transcended many of the aspects of the creation of such structures. Through time slave labor has been replaced by machines, and limestone concrete constructions have given way to treat concrete and steel stadiums. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper